Thursday, January 31, 2013

Branch Rickey Changed the World

Jackie Robinson
           Today marks what would have been Jackie Robinson's 94th Birthday. For those who may not know Jackie Robinson, he was the first African-American professional baseball player. He broke a seemingly insurmountable color barrier at the time and opened the door for other athletes of color to follow in his footsteps. It seems as though most people know of Jackie Robinson, but not many people know of the man who signed him to the Brooklyn Dodgers roster: Branch Rickey.

Rickey signing Robinson
            In my opinion, without Branch Rickey, the extensive world of sports in which us Americans embrace so greatly would simply not be close to what it is. At the time,  "any links with blacks would mark [baseball] as beyond the pale. Moreover, from the Jim Crow era down to the 1930s it would probably have been impossible to have integrated a Major League team without inspiring a violent backlash, even in many northern cities, and no one was willing to take the risk," (Jackie Robinson and the Integration of Baseball). 

          

         Out of fear, baseball stayed segregated, until Branch Rickey's signing. Without his incredibly brave decision, who is to predict what kind of sports world we would embrace today? I find it an incredible American ideal to stick to the social norm and not step outside of one's boundaries. As shown though with Rickey's signing of Jackie Robinson, bravery can have incredible benefits for everyone. In this case, changing not only baseball, but the world of sports forever while providing a foundation of racial equality to be built on up until today. 

         What do you think the sports world would be like without Branch Rickey? Comment below with your thoughts!

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

A Domesticated Killer

       A study done by Nature.com has just opened my eyes to an unseen and widely disregarded problem. Cats are causing more deaths of birds and mammals each year than all other human causes.

Cat after killing rabbit
The estimated numbers are:

1.4-3.7 billion birds killed each year
6.9-20.7 billion mammals killed each year

According to Nautre.com, "Our findings suggest that free-ranging cats likely the single greatest source of anthropogenic mortality for US birds and mammals". 

This new discovery is truly staggering. Although stated that the majority of the cats are un-owned, a significant percentage is still from the exact domesticated cats that owners across the nation have come to love. Cat owners may argue that it's just the nature of their cats, but that's truly insensitive in regards to the widespread deaths they are causing for really no reason. Cats of all shapes, sizes and domestication are contributing to the tens of billions of deaths annually.

I think though that it is an incredible American value to disregard such findings. For Americans, (me included with my dog) we think that our pets could never be the brunt of atrocities. Cat owners included may think that their cat can't possibly be the cause of such deaths. They're wrong. Instead of just disregarding such findings, Americans need to become more aware of occurrences around them, like their pets killing more birds and mammals than themselves each year.

What do you think? Do Americans have a problem of disregarding information possibly pertaining to themselves? Any personal experiences? Please share in the comments!






Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Final Exam, Racial Equality: A Long Time Coming

"Cheers" taken by Pete Souza
           The “Beer Summit Picture” is an important contemporary American artifact because it represents the incredible growth and current status of the United States of America, striving to achieve racial equality. It relates to our class because it compares current racial equality to inequality shown in the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, Glory and even theatrical productions. In the picture, taken by official white house photographer Pete Souza, there are three men, Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr., Police Sergeant James Crowley and President Barack Obama. Souza decided to make the background dark, focusing all attention on the men at the table. More importantly though, is the theme of equality. All three men share equal thirds of the picture, showing a perfect division of space and power. In addition, they all are uniting their beverages in the middle of the table, coming together as a sign of mutual respect for one another. Such equality and respect is expressed and embraced in today’s America, although it wasn’t at all the case just over a century and a half ago.

            In The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, Frederick Douglass realized the racial inequality occurring with his observation, “There were horses and men, cattle and women, pigs and children, all holding the same rank in the scale of being, and were all subjected to the same narrow examination” (51). This statement truly portrays the horrible inequality occurring in the early 19th century. Other human beings were being ranked and treated like horses, cattle and pigs. White men did the ranking. The people being ranked among the animals were black.

            Also in the film, Glory, Denzel Washington’s character, Trip, made another important realization of racial inequality occurring. When speaking with Colonel Shaw, the leader of the all-black 54th Regiment Massachusetts Infantry, he proclaimed, “What about us, what do we get?” comparing the life of Colonel Shaw (a white man) upon return home versus the lives of himself and the rest of the all black infantry. Wary of the fact that they were risking their lives on the battlefield for the Union army though weren’t going to be treated equally with the white men doing the same.

Play Advertisement
            Finally, even theatrical productions in the early 20th century were incredibly degrading to African-Americans, blatantly spelling out the ideals of racial inequality. As found on spirobolos.com through Mr. Bolos’ Delicious page Racism and the Undercaste, an incredible display of racial inequality can be seen through an advertisement for a relatively popular play at the time. The feature of the advertisement shows two pictures of seemingly different actors involved in the play, however they are the same person. The portrait on the left shows a white man with, as Mr. Bolos put it, “dignity”. His hair is combed and parted, his body language appears confident, with a slight grin. His chin is up and overall seems extremely well put together. As for the image on the right, the same actor is now in complete blackface, with glaring red lipstick, unkempt hair and a truly crazed expression. His eyes are wide open and a look of sheer terror is shown on his face. The stark contrast of the appearances of the same actor in different costumes, the dignified white versus the crazed black, truly shows the extreme ideals and practices of racial inequality merely a century ago.

           In conclusion, the “Beer Summit” picture shows the current racial equality in American society, as three men, two black and one white, can now share a beer in harmony; although as we have seen throughout this first semester of American Studies, it has been a long time coming for blacks in America trying to achieve racial equality.

Monday, January 7, 2013

Show Me The Money!

While watching a Christmas special of the popular television show, Duck Dynasty- a reality show about the hilarious and unorthodox family behind a duck hunting company (for those who don't know the show, an overview can be seen through this link) - something really spoke to me about american ideals.
The character, Si

The company threw a holiday party for local children, with the CEO of the company, Willie, playing Santa Claus while the always entertaining and unpredictable uncle and employee of Willie named "Si" being Santa's helper. When one little girl was asked by Willie what she wanted for Christmas, she replied that she wanted art supplies because she wanted to be an artist. Si sharply butted in by saying that there isn't any money to be made in the art profession.



I feel that the point he made was incredibly applicable to american ideals of occupations. It's all about where the money is. It's heard so incredibly often the terms of people having "good" or "bad" jobs. Just as we have discussed in class, "good" and "bad" by no means reflect the quality of the person performing the jobs or even quality of work, just the job's pay. Personally, I've heard it and seen it time and time again the obsession with one's income. For example, extremely reputable and widely subscribed to Forbes magazine releases the annually anticipated "Forbes 400" list. This list profiles the 400 wealthiest Americans for all subscribes to revere in their wealthy aura. The "list" speaks wonders about american ideals.

It's somewhat eye-opening that one's occupation in the american culture is viewed upon based on the money that they make and not the quality or purpose of the work.

What do you think about American values of one's occupations purpose? How can media change this ideal? Please let me know your thoughts!